update – July 21, 2016 – according to Ken Pavia Alexander Shlemenko won his appeal and is totally free to fight
_________________
This week the California state athletic commission Camiseta Tottenham Hotspur handed out a three year suspension to Alexander Shlemenko who evaluated positive for prohibited PED’s following his last Bellator bout.
This is no doubt evidence of a Camiseta VfL Wolfsburg changing of the guard in terms Camiseta SS Lazio of how regulators are going to deal with drug cheats. Penalties will become increasingly heavy handed and that is a good thing. There are lessons to be learned, however, from this affair and these are not limited to athletes. Regulators need to understand that, given the major consequences suspensions have on a fighter’s livelihood, integrity in the testing process should be in place and due process during regulatory hearings is imperative. Here the California state athletic commission fell short on both counts.
The Shlemenko hearing, which begins at just past the one hour twenty minute mark of the below video is worth reviewing. The commission all but mocks Shlemenko for choosing to be represented by a lawyer and even make comments that demonstrate fettered discretion with minds appearing to be made up prior to full submissions being digested. The proposed penalties against Shlemenko were apparently far much more lenient initially only turning much more punitive in the days prior to the requested hearing. The testing process leaves much to be desired as well with the evidence establishing that the CSAC did not collect a B sample despite their contract with the testing facility requiring this to be conducted. Whether or not collection of a B sample is required under the California regulatory scheme, a question a Court will likely ultimately answer as Shlemenko has indicated he is seeking to judicially review the ban, it is clear that the CSAC has no set objective standards in place outlining the required steps needed for drug sample collection and testing.
Regulators ought to have a clear legislative framework for the PED tests they are allowed to conduct, a clear set of penalties for those who fail them, firm standards in place for the integrity of the collection and testing process and lastly respect for due process rights of athletes who hold the state to their statutory concern of proof.
Share this:
Twitter
Facebook
Like this:
Like Loading…
Related
Shlemenko Doping Penalties decreased – full Judicial ReasonsJuly 21, 2016In “California combat sports Law”
Let’s Talk Brock Lesnar, Doping and potential legal FalloutJuly 16, 2016With 8 comments
Nevada state athletic commission Overhauls Anti Doping RegulationsOctober 11, 2016In “Doping”